Took me time to go through all of the comments, but I genuinely enjoyed the article. It proved to be very valuable to me and I’m positive to all of the commenters right here! It’s always great when you can not only be informed, but in addition entertained! I am sure you had enjoyment writing this write-up.

Was this EVER available?? It is always sold out??

The statue is very nice. Adam Hughes did an awesome work on the design and the statue itself was sculpted and painted very well.

Great Job Sideshow

I’m really glad I’ve got this piece it looks so beautiful. Sideshow keep this line going!

Adam Huges does what artists like Arnold Armitage, Olivia De Berardinis, Gil Elvgren, Zoe Mozert, George Petty & Alberto Vargas made famous; Cheesecake/Pin-up art.
When I received thsi statue for my Spider-Man collection, my wife said “WOW! What a beautiful piece of art” and noted that it reminded her of Olivia’s paintings.
When I told her about the controversy about this statue, all she could say was that “Some people really need to get a life…or get l**d.”

lord……. have mercy… baby’s got her blue jeans on!

It’s amazing the press that this statue has received – good for sideshow! The women rallying against MJ are jealous of her body. Essentially, that’s what it comes down to. I am a fan of females. I treat them with great respect and happen to also love their bodies. Am I not supposed to feel that way? Is a man’s wife not supposed to touch their husband’s laundry? If they do, does that make them subserviant? Rediculous! How ODD is it that a female might be doing chores or relaxing around the apartment in something she feels comfortable in? What? You mean she isn’t wearing a suit? Unheard of! It is odd that with so much exposure of the female form in media/art that MJ (the symbol of strength in a relationship) was chosen to go after by these extremists. This statue is meant to show a fun situation in the lives of one of the longest lasting couples in fiction. Nothing about it is degrading to women. My girlfriend and I can’t wait until it’s on our shelf.

Wow I’m amazed by some primal reactions on a statue while you can get pornography on the net. Wrong fight ladies. Myself I order this one because it’s fun, just a big wink at the whole Spiderman story. I can’t but imagine Spidey waiting in a pink night gow for his outfit to dry which will explain the big smile of Jane and Jane telling him “but honey how can you stain your outfit like that all the time, it wouldn’t be for me and you’ll have to go naked soon” then having him looking down ashamed. Personaly if my wife would ever wash my clothes like this I’m sure she doesn’t think degrading but “hey honey want to join the party”. This is what we call complicity in a couple and that’s what this statue is about between Jane and Parker.

Yes, there are worse things out there but that doesn’t really make a difference as to what the nature of this one is. And the fact that it’s accurate to Hughes’ original work is either here nor there. I don’t think anyone’s saying that his portrayal of Mary Jane wasn’t sexist but the statue is. Yeah, it looks like the picture it’s based on. The picture is just as bad.
And yes, she’s fully dressed (well, basically), and it would be more offensive if she were naked, but your whole argument seems to just boil down to ‘it may be sexist but so is the comic, and besides, it could be worse’.

Looks like everyone’s saying a lot of the same things. Yes, it is a comic book character: however degrading it might be, it’s not a real person. But the fact that people need to point out it’s not a real person it’s happening to suggests it would be bad if it was a real person.
Also, Mary Jane probably would do the laundry, and doing the laundry isn’t degrading in itself. But she probably showers and goes to the toilet too, we just don’t see statues of it.
If you don’t find this offensive, then that’s one thing, but it’s a barefoot woman in a g-string with cleavage bursting out and a lot of midriff showing, bending over a laundry basket, so I can’t believe that anyone’s surprised people find it offensive.
And the fact that there’s more degrading portrayals of women out there in comics or real life doesn’t make this better; don’t use it as a defense.
People obviously think it’s sexual (eg first 8 posts). If you want slutty artwork, that’s fine, but don’t pretend it’s not that.

As a work of art, it is quite attractive, and the artist has done a great job on a fantasy piece. But from a feminist point of view, it is obviously degrading. Those people saying that freedom of speech should mean that they cannot be told what to like and what not to like are certainly missing the point – that freedom of speech is all about projecting what you believe. To listen or not to listen is anyone’s choice; but just understand that people will voice their opinions. There isn’t really anything you can do about it.

I myself am a fan of MJ, and much as I like to see her looking attractive, I have to agree that I’d have preferred to see her in something less sex-symbol-like and more imposing. Perhaps a more fun piece would be her waiting impatiently in front of a washing machine, maybe looking at her watch and thinking how she could be doing something better with her time?

This entire issue is overblown, but there is a feasible standpoint to it.

Man..sold out already. What do we have to do get a higher production run on these? With all the bonus publicity this piece has been getting, I feel it would be warranted. Thanks!

Right….artist….this statue is amazing don’t change a thing Sideshow! It’s a drawing not based on reality, but imagination. Something a true artist would be understand…great piece look forward to this one any many more like it. Keep up the good work Sideshow!

Sexist? who cares. I’m just wondering where the poor girl’s internal organs went! and wondering what SHE was bitten by to give her that sense of balance.

seriously… it’s very pretty.. but the anatomy and balance issues destroy this piece for me. Maybe it’s just because I’m an artist and know what the real stuff’s supposed to look like?

Oh come on! This is a simple pinup girl. It’s sexy not sexist. Since I’m a woman who has been on the receiving end of sexism before and am an artist myself I can tell the difference. There’s a lot of things that lead to domestic violence but a woman being sexy or doing laundry aren’t on the list, anti-female culture does lead to abuse no question about it but this how is this anti-female? Seems to me like it’s celebrating female beauty. It’s not implying women are stupid, weak, or in any way inferior. Merely that women are sexy and and I’m sorry if some of the women complaining don’t feel that women should be sexy but I sure do and am very proud of my sexuality and being a woman, while I of course feel it more important for a man to find me smart, talented, and creative you can bet I also want them to think I’m sexy (and to be fair to men I find them sexy too and there aren’t nearly enough pieces of sexy male art out there).

Is this piece from the 1940′s or what? Let me tell you one thing: I recognize sexism and racism when I see it. This is like having a statue celebrating slavery. You are of course free to have such one as well, but do not try to convince me that such a statue is celebrating freedom. Neither is this. So do not get surprised when people get upset. You know, that’s also part of freedom of speech. What is offensive or not has nothing to do with nudity or sex, but how you look at other people and their place as subjects in your world.

I find this statue to be very tasteful and in a way Loving. It’s simply an attractive female Who happens to be washing her husbands Outfit.What, would it have been more feasible to have MJ standing in front of a Washmachine?Some people always have to find something to complain about. Well As a 29 year old male I know what is tasteful and or isn’t acceptable, Maybe if MJ wasn’t wearing a shirt at all and was topless then I could see the Debate. However this is not the case! And being if that were the case the amount of sales Sideshow would have would be astronomecal. So Obviously Not only do SIdeshow and Marvel have Integrity, but they also aren’t greedy. I guess let the people who want to complain do so. I stick by Marvel and Sideshow Collectibles 100%

Cindy, how do you know we’re not out campaigning about women being abused? Working on domestic violence is part of my job. That’s partly why I don’t like the doll; there are definitely links between an anti-female culture and the rise of domestic violence. Read any book about it — I’ve been studying it for 10 years.

Love it. Love it. Love it.

I don’t think i can say it enough, to me its the way I would like to see Mary-Jane in the movies, that very model of a woman. Absolutely fantastic piece of art.

People wonder why i love comic books, second to story line, its all about the art.

Did I mention I Love IT??

You know, Peter Parker is a pretty nice guy. One would think that he would at least try to get his Mary Jane some clothes that weren’t several sizes too small. Especially since she’s nice enough to wash his suit by hand.

The detail is really outstanding. I just wish the subject didn’t manage to portray women as sexual objects and domestic slaves at the same time.

get a grip!!!!!! There are women being abused every day and you freak about this!!!!!!

I support your mary jane doing laundry statue. It’s hot, comical, and fun. Great job.

I hope Sideshow is listening….I have a great idea…

You can do a variant edition of the MJ Statue for those who have a problem with the first edition.

You can call it “Burkha MJ” cover her from head to toe in fabric with only a space for her eyes to peek out.

Lord knows that women in this country never ever wear thongs, or tight jeans, or take their shoes off, or “GASP” look thru a laundry basket…oh and God Forbid they ever bend over….

People who are angry about a statue of a fictional character (that they obviously know nothing about) to the point they rant and rave for weeks obviously have larger issues in their lives to deal with….like lack of employment and/or anything better to do.

With everything that is wrong with this country…THIS is their issue? THIS?!?!?! Really? Seriously?

I can think of several issues that rank as more important than the “MJ Statue debate” like the “Taste’s Great/Less Filling” debate that has raged for decades now.

Has anyone pointed out that the people up in arms about this statue, based on their comments and lack of knowledge of the subject matter, neither:

1) Read Comics, nor

2) Collect Statues of Comic Characters, nor

3) Know anything about these characters, nor

4) Took the time to actually look at the piece to realize she is not “Doing Laundry” she is looking thru a basket and discovering his Secret Identity?

For the life of me I don’t understand why Marvel or Sideshow would seriously consider pressure from a group of people that are not their customers, not their demographic, and do not have the slightest bit of knowledge or interest in their products.

OMG!!! MJ is portrayed as SEXY?!?!?! well she was a lingerie model.

OMG!!! Is that a woman standing over a laundry basket….I THOUGHT THAT WAS OUTLAWED ALONG WITH FREE SPEECH…wasn’t it?

In order to boycott a product wouldn’t you have to be a consumer of it first?

People are trying to keep this from being made so i hear.
thats ridiculous…MAKE THIS AND SHIP IT!

I have order the MJ since first minute on day one, I love this MJ statue and her posting, the statue show MJ smiling at people or spidey while washing spidey costum with a pair of fitted jean, nothing wrong with it, the only thing wrong is those people have bad imagination on MJ.

Marvel / Sideshow please get keep the line going, and do not change MJ posting, for those people who don’t like MJ post, they don’t have to buy it, it is not for eveyone.

That’s hot stuff. But will probably draw some heat of other kind from feminists.
Too bad the film’s MJ isn’t that hot.

I think this little statuette is sad – and that some people like it so much is ever sadder. Sorry – those that think the objections are about her being “sexy” or “doing the occasional laundry for her husband” are, as usual, missing the point of the objections. They are also missing the point of feminism, as well…

April, that’s so cliche to call anything you don’t agree with ‘un-American’. What does your nation-state have to do with it? I’m British anyway, and patriotism is for people with low-IQs.

Wow, this look’s real, it is beatiful, and even if I wasn’t a spidey fan I would buy this one. Adam Hughes has achieved his punctillio in terms of statue art.

Keep up the good work.

I don’t see how this is sexist?

Peter Parker swings around the city all day, punching bad guys and dealing with threats with the Avengers. Mary Jane, when not acting, probably has free time waiting for her agent to call. What’s she gonna do, sit on the couch, eating chips, and tell Pete “Oh honey, I want some lasagna for dinner. Oh and you need to do a load of towels,” or is she gonna go “Hmm. I don’t wanna sit around doing nothing. Hey, I’ll do laundry and throw in Peter’s spare costume.”

Besides, this statute is no indication that Peter doesn’t stay at home on a slow Sunday afternoon when MJ is at auditions and decide to do chores. For all we know, this could be a surprise for Peter who might do all the laundry normally.

And on top of that, it looks to me like MJ is just trying to give her husband something nice to come home to. After handling bad guys all day, I’m sure Peter just wants to see his wife. So she decided to look sexy for him.

This statue is sold out. The fans want it. I don’t see why people who aren’t fans feel the need to use the success of Spider-Man 3 to try and disappoint these fans. There is nothing wrong with this statue. Read the article on http://www.cooltoyreview.com if you disagree. I just don’t see why people need to whine about such a small thing when there are Bratz dolls at Target and rap videos on MTV. There are far worse things in the world than a comic book statue. Sideshow, you would be doing your fans and the industry a favor by putting this statue out as planned.

wow, congratulations on missing the point entirely. well, if your going by the one closeup photo of the mary jane statuete, and saying that’s impossible and would be ‘back breaking to attain’…sculpting yourself to be as in top of shape as david, well I guess that’s a cake walk, huh? Adam Hughes isn’t known for ridiculous out of proportion drawings, while his woman are certainly idealized, they’re certainly not ‘distorted’.
I’ll say it once again, when it comes down to it you have your own choice; accept that men are pigs and ignore this tiny lil statuette, or you can start an uproar and maybe get them pulled from a few store shelves(of which many they’re not already available in).

by the way, I don’t know if having a huge effing head is considered ‘anatomically perfect’

it’s obvious that these women won’t be buying this statue. the fans who ordered it aren’t b@#ching about the way it looks so why change it to please people who aren’t even sideshow customers.it’s ok not to be pc.

Takeshi Brown, let me get this straight. You’re comparing this mass-produced comic character statue to the status of David? David. One of the greatest sculpted figures ever produced.

I’m sorry, that’s just me laughing. But here, in the spirit of education, I’ll humour you a bit.

David represents the peak of physical beauty and perfection in the males of our species. He’s not meant to be titillating, and if you find him to be so, I’d be a touch concerned. Sideshow’s Mary Jane is a representation of male fantasy. She is meant to be sexually appealing. David is anatomically near perfect and, in theory, you could attain his physique. MJ is anatomically distorted and a woman would have to literally break her back to even begin to resemble her.

I have been amazed at the attention this fantastic piece has gotten in the media in the USA. I am a huge Adam Hughes and Sideshow fan and when they announced a line of AH Marvel comiquettes I could not have been happier. The first two pieces have been pure “Cheesecake” and I love it. I am all for free speech and the right to opinions, this is something I feel the feminists who have spoken out against this piece do not share the right to an opposing view to theirs. They do not value yours or mine opinion on this matter, in-fact they want to preach from the pulpit and tell us how bold we are to want this stuff. I have a fiancée, I have a mother and I have four sisters. I love them and treat them with respect, as we all should with our female friends, mothers and wives. To say that this is degrading to women is IMO nonsense. I hope Sideshow stands firm on this piece and releases it as was advertised. I also hope they realise they have more fans who want this piece than they have detractors who have no

The doll is ridiculous. MJ is so much more than she’s depicted here. And people like Ghost and Mike K saying things like “this is one woman that won’t reject me”, and “sadly, real women don’t look like comic book drawings” — I’m embarrassed for you. A real woman with a real body is so much better than this.

Personally I don’t like it, I think it’s rather tragic if people find it sexy as it is not REAL or even based on a real person.
However if other people want it- than whatever I’m sure you’ll enjoy your purchase and be the envy of your friend.
Being a feminist- not that being a feminist is a bad thing, I don’t get why folk are using it as an insult- has nothing to do with disliking this thing.
Given that Mary Jane is so strong in the films I feel let down that she is shown like that, I’d rather see her learning a script or something.

for heaven’s sake it’s a piece of PLASTIC. stop drooling over it and get a life.

All this free publicity the crazies are giving this statue is gonna make Sideshow a fortune. That being said, how ’bout a smaller, cheaper version in the inevitable future production runs?

ANYONE’S inability to even have a sense of humor over the Sideshow/Hughes statue is ASTOUNDING! It’s painfully obvious that all of you are missing the point of this playful, fun piece of art.

1. MJ has been everything from a stage Actress to a Lingerie model in the comics. You obviously don’t or haven’t read Spider-Man in the past 20 years or you’d know this.

2. She’s not HAND WASHING the Spidey suit. She’s finding it in a Laundry basket.

3. If you’re upset she’s not portraying MJ like Dunst in the movies… then you obviously have no idea who the MJ character really is. She’s a supermodel, not some whiny waive thin tone deaf little girl. She’s supposed to be stacked.

Now I may be wrong, but ANYONE who complains about this piece obvious does NOT read Superhero comics. If you did, I’d consider you a hypocrite. I enjoy the Indie stuff (SiP and Lenore) but without Spider-man, X-Men and other comics, they wouldn’t exist. Do you think Terry Moore is offended by this piece? I HIGHLY doubt it!

God bless Adam Hughes, God bless Sideshow, and God bless America!!

This is crazy. There is nothing wrong with this statue, it’s Comic ART for Heaven’s sake!!!! Sideshow… don’t change your ways!

For if they don’t like it they don’t have to buy it!!! Enough said!! If you crazies don’t like it.. don’t look at it!!!

This is hott!!! I just saw the dateline show and they said that some people are pissed that this is being made!! The HELL with them!! This is a awsome piece I can’t wait to get it.

I also hope Sideshow won’t cave for all this coverage the artwork is getting. There is absolutely no reason to get worked up over something so tame in my opinion. People think they can make a big fuss over nothing feel they have the power to try to imped their point of view over the consumer’s interests.

For all of you “moral” extremists who find this figurine offensive, maybe someone will cast one of Jerry Falwell just for you.

I don’t see anything wrong with Adam Hughes artwork, or this statue. It is simply an image of Mary Jane finding Peter’s Spidey costume in the laundry basket; there are other sketches where she is trying on the suit to see what it would be like to be Spider-man. There is nothing there to imply that she is subservient to Peter and doing his laundry. In fact, I never even thought of that angle until some misguided people brought it up. If people would just worry about the real things in life that need fixing, this would be a lot better planet to live on.

Keep up the great work Sideshow! I will continue to buy every piece in the Adam Hughes line, and fully support you, Adam and Marvel in presenting these pieces to the fans that truly enjoy them.

I love the facial sculpt and paintjob on this. And what A fun piece, very ‘comic book’, exactly as it should be… well done for another great piece Sideshow!

I can’t believe the MORAL MINORITY is trying to police every aspect of life now. Mary Jane is a beautiful piece, completely in line with the beautiful comics and the artistic heritage of the medium. The only people who would have a problem with her would feel uncomfortable about the statue of David. A great piece I wish I had pre-ordered when I had the chance.

Congratulations to Sideshow and Adam Hughes on another great collectible figure. Both my wife and I are looking forward to not only the first two in this line but the next offering as well. Keep up the good work!

These PC extremists represent a small minority that are desperate for attention and subsist on BS crusades.
You never hear sexist complaints of Comicdom’s overly endowed, hyper muscular, low body fat, unrealistic depictions of men do you? So get over it.
Please Sideshow and Marvel, Don’t cave in to this radical minority’s point of view. I collect this line and although I skipped on this statue because it doesn’t represent a Superheroine which is what I prefer to collect, I hope I can collect the future additions to this wonderful line of statues and all these bored desperate people go back to hiding under their rocks.
Keep up The good work Sideshow!

people need to chill out…this thing is getting coverage in the NY Post…MJ as a comicbook charecter has almost always been portrayed as a strong woman and one of the most beautiful in the MU…as for physical features….MJ has always had juggs….lol….granted…not powergirl sized…but relatively busty….check Frank Cho’s MJ…Dodson’s…Bagely’s…McFarlene’s…Romita’s….as for the g-string…walk into any High school in Queens,NY during the spring….most girls have a lil bit of thong strings peekin out…most comicbook charecters are drawn a lil exagerated….its not like she’s Jessica Rabbit exagerated… In the movies she’s portrayed as lil more than a damsel in distress…in the comics she’s peter’s rock….check Sensational Spider-Man Annual #1 released a lil less than a month ago for proof…people need to stop overreacting over a statue…there’s a hell of a lot of stuff thats worse than this…

It’s a really nice statue. I can’t afford to join the line, but it really does have a lot of character. As far as being sexist goes—Women do their boyfriend’s laundry all the time, and they do it for them all the time, she’s not being forced to do it, she’s even smiling, so it shouldn’t be a topic for debate.

Very nice statue though, it’ll be interesting to see what other statues come out. Please keep it up Sideshow!

Wow, this really got out of hand… I mean, all of this fuss over a piece of art? Things like this bother me, that someone would take such an innocent statue and twist it into some symbol for Sexist comic characters and horny fanboys. It’s silly to attach so much weight to such a simple thing. I for one think it’s a wonderful statue, and even though I am not purchasing it…. And I never thought for a second that it would get this kind of reaction. Many things in this world deserve negative response… this is not one of them. Much worse in the world than a slightly suggestive (supposedly) statue.

This is horrible! She looks like a damn whore. She needs a better belt, her ASS is hanging out.
Where’s MJ the professional?
This is practiaclly pornographic..

I love this statue and representation of a comic book character. Please Sideshow don’t let these extremist take away quality products from true collectors. Most of these comments are from people who have no idea what this is based on and are ignorant to the subject matter.

For those who have posted this statue is sexist and degrading to women – grow up. If you aren’t a collector and simply chiming in with your 2 cents, my suggestion is to exercise your right to not look. If your world is so organized and sanitized that you have this kind of time on your hands, how nice for you. Just choose to not like it and leave it alone, especially for the collectors who really want the statue. BTW, I am a heterosexual woman and I am NOT blind. I still know how to appreciate art when I see it and I’m mature enough to not take it as a personal slam against my gender.

ok this is becoming ridiculous.maybe she is not doing the laundry. maybe she found the spidey costume in the wash while she was searching for her sexy lady undies. i think that all of the crazy people stressing this statue need to get a life. its a comic book character, not your mother. if it was your mother….your mom would be hot

I see nothing wrong with this statue. The only thing I hear thats wrong is not the pose but the fact that she’s doing peter’s laundry. If they ever picked up an issue of spiderman they would know mj was an accress and stuff. Plus, with the fact that he outted himself to the world maybe she felt bad decided to do something nice for him. But, oh no, the feminist got to take it to the ass about it & see something thats not really there.

Please Sideshow, do not back down to censorship. Produce the piece & keep doing a good job.

Hey you guys, MJ is NOT sexist. She is a strong woman, she is Peter’s rock and confidant, why can’t she be sexy at the same time? Her face portrays her strength even though she may look submissive in her pose. The fact that she is wearing pearls while wearing her ultra-modern outfit makes fun of that housewife stereotype. Besides it’s all just for fun in the end anyway.

I just want my dinner on the table when I get home from a hard day swinging around the city! IS THAT SO MUCH TO ASK?

I think my wife is the only feminist that thinks this is hot. =)
She’s grounded to reality and not caught up with trivial nonsense. Love it; wish it was not sold out.

WoW!! How great is she?! =) Just goes to show you that housewives and homemakers CAN be sexy as hell!

This has got to be one of the most sexist statuettes I’ve ever seen. People want a sexy MJ statue. Fine. But does she have to be in such a subservient pose? And doing Peter’s laundry no less! Besides, Peter is a big boy and can do his OWN laundry.

You’d never find a statue like this of Wolverine or Spidey; the (male) fans would never stand for it. It’s offensive and degrading to women.

I also find it very convenient that most posts pointing that out are being “moderated”.

This is lame and sexist.

This statue is pretty offensive folks

wow, a woman bent over doing her husband’s laundry with her butt, chest, and thong on display, and wearing pearls no less! Is this a subtle comment on the fact that she plays no role in the movie besides eye candy?

Okay, I see why the guys want it – MJ is hot. But to be fair, when can I order Spidey on his hands and knees scrubbing Mary Jane’s apartment floor in his super tight Calvin Klein briefs?

That I would pay BIG bucks for.

1st statue I ever wanted was the $300 Dr.Doom on his throne one….but it was sold out…..this is only the 2nd one I ever wanted…Ive had a thing for MJ since I was 5….well it was her and Jessica Rabbit…great statue…..really captures that whole hottest thing in the MU…how did Peter get this girl? look…

so wait….thong…or g-string?…..lol…nvm…this statue is amazing..

Oh, honey! If I were only 18″ tall.

why isnt she this hot in the movie??

very beautiful!!

GREAT COMIQUETTE & ALL, BUT WHEN WILL IT BE AVAILABLE TO ORDER?

Who cares if MJ isn’t a superhero!? She is gorgeous,this comiquette is gorgeous! Bring on Ms.Betty Banner!
I had a change of heart. I want this comiquette baaaaaad!
Pass on this hot mama?! No way Bubba!

I agree with the people that commented “easy pass.” Yes, she is a major part of the Spider-Man history, but she’s not a superhero, just an accessory piece. But, that’s all the Adam Hughes line is going to be… buxom women in suggestive poses. I’ll take my Green Goblin or Doctor Doom over this or the White Queen any day! Just biding my time until the Cap exclusive comes to my door.

All of Adam’s female drawings are that way – a lot of ” T & A ” . Is MJ really that naughty or just drawn that way? I guess from the comments, the fan boys have already made up their minds!

Again, to paraphrase Borat “I like. How much?”.
No really, how much?
I mean what else can I say that hasn’t already been said, it’s a great 3D traslation of what I’m guessing is a very hot/cute piece of art. Much like the awesome AH Emma Frost comiquette.
Man, I really wish they’d do AH’s Zatanna (from the DC Direct poster) as a comiquette, or his Catwoman from the same series. Or for Hughes to design a Gwen Stacey or Polaris.

I hope they make a very large number of these because there is probably going to be a very high demand for these. The face is absolutely amazing!! I will definitely be getting one of these.

This statue looks great! First Emma Frost and now Mary Jane.

This is soooooo hot.Its going to look great next to Emma.

I think this is going to be the best comic based statue I will have ever seen

spidey is such a lucky man

Adam, you’ve done a great job with your drawings and it great to see them brought to life by SS. I can’t wait to get this on order and get Emma in hand this month. Adam Hughes and Sideshow, a horny teenagers dream come true.

Easy pass for me, she’s not a superhero. What’s next Betty Banner?

MJ sho’nuff got some nice drawers. Define drawer(s) as you wish. And, Adam, a dead Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru would definitely be classified as inaction figures.

Thank you Mr. Hughes!

this is an excellent sculpt, she looks really coy, for a marvel figure, your best yet, i can’t wait.

Dang it! Now I can’t get the darned “Thong Song” out of my head. LOL She is most sexy for sure, yum yum. Sign me up for sure on this one, she will look great beside dear Emma. Big thanks to Sideshow and Adam for this amazing lookin Mary Jane, I can’t wait.

Hope the exclusive is Spiderman’s black costume in her hand. Though I would take another AH art piece.

Sorry but naah. It’s a girl in some Jeans holding a spider-man mask [just so people know it's comic related]. Second time this has been done. Why do people want Mary Jane statues? Where’s my Adam Hughes inspired Scarlet Witch statue? Next please.

judging by the face only this is the best marvel sculpt of a female I’ve seen
Much better than the emma Frost
im getting this for sure

HAWT!!!

Damn, Peter is a lucky man.

In the words of BORAT. “WEWAH!WEWAH! THAT’S A NICE!

If it didn’t say AH! I wouldn’t have guessed it’s based off his work. Looks great though. I’m not going ga ga like some ppl who’ve never been that close to a woman I guess =D

HOT REALLY HOOOOOOT

WOW! AH! design at that.
nice detail on the weave belt. can’t wait to see the whole thing. i wonder what the exclusive variant/accessory will be?

i’d like to see an SS diorama contest using the MJ Comiquette and other stats. i bet the entries would be hilarious!

Who would hit Mary Jane? hahahaha

On second thoughts… it’s just to good to be true. Something Peter Parker might get??

HOT. Definitely: hot! Whit a capital H and so on… Can’t breath… (Vader breathing sound…)

dang she is HOT!!!!